Hillary clinton for president essay

2018How is this not classified? 2019s close aide and confidante, Huma Abedin. 2019s private account, between the then-secretary hillary clinton for president essay state and a second person, whose name Abedin did not recognize.

Obama’s use of an alias to e-mail Hillary is why the Clinton e-mail scandal never had a chance of leading to criminal charges. Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predicted, by Andrew C. How is this not classified? So exclaimed Hillary Clinton’s close aide and confidante, Huma Abedin. The FBI had just shown her an old e-mail exchange, over Clinton’s private account, between the then-secretary of state and a second person, whose name Abedin did not recognize.

It was the president of the United States, Barack Obama, using a pseudonym to conduct communications over a non-secure e-mail system — something anyone with a high-level security clearance, such as Huma Abedin, would instantly realize was a major breach. Abedin was sufficiently stunned that, for just a moment, the bottomless capacity of Clinton insiders to keep cool in a scandal was overcome. She recovered quickly enough, though. Abedin knew an insurance policy when she saw one. As I explained in February, when it emerged that the White House was refusing to disclose at least 22 communications Obama had exchanged with then-secretary Clinton over the latter’s private e-mail account, we knew that Obama had knowingly engaged in the same misconduct that was the focus of the Clinton probe: the reckless mishandling of classified information. To be sure, he did so on a smaller scale. Clinton’s recklessness was systematic: She intentionally set up a non-secure, non-government communications framework, making it inevitable that classified information would be mishandled, and that federal record-keeping laws would be flouted.

Still, the difference in scale is not a difference in kind. Obama and Clinton were highly relevant evidence. Indeed, imagine what would have happened had Clinton been indicted. Clinton’s defense lawyers would have demanded the disclosure of the e-mails in order to show that Obama had engaged in the same misconduct, yet only she, not he, was being prosecuted. Clinton’s lawyers would have won. In fact, in any other case — i. Justice Department itself introducing the Obama-Clinton e-mails into evidence.

As noted above, the FBI told Huma Abedin that the name she did not recognize in the e-mail with Clinton was an Obama alias. For the agents to do this ran afoul of investigative protocols. The point of an FBI interview is for the interviewee to provide information to the investigators, not the other way around. If agents give information to potential witnesses, the government gets accused of trumping up the case. But of course, that’s only a problem if there is actually going to be a case.

In this instance, it was never going to happen. The president’s involvement guaranteed that . Abedin in on the president’s involvement? Abedin was startled by this revelation. No wonder: People in her lofty position know that direct presidential communications with high-ranking officials who have national-security and foreign-policy responsibilities are presumptively classified. To convey this, and thus convey the legal significance of Obama’s involvement, I can’t much improve on what I told you back in February.

Petraeus pled guilty because he knew the case against him was a slam-dunk. President Obama’s own executive order — EO 13526. The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security. Included among these categories: foreign relations, foreign activities of the United States, military plans, and intelligence activities. Abedin knew, as the FBI agents who were interviewing her surely knew, that at least some of Obama’s pseudonymous exchanges with Clinton had to have crossed into these categories. As I said in February, this fact would profoundly embarrass Obama if the e-mails were publicly disclosed.

Hundreds of times, despite Clinton’s indignant insistence that she never sent or received classified information, the State Department has had to concede that her e-mails must be redacted or withheld from public disclosure because they contain information that is patently classified. That is why, as I argued in February, Obama is trying to get away with the vaporous claim that presidential communications must be kept confidential. That would be tantamount to an admission that Obama engaged in the same violation of law as Clinton. Again, this is why the prosecution of Mrs. Clinton never had a chance of happening. He had to take this position because he had himself effectively endorsed the practice of high-level communications through non-secure channels. This is also why the Justice Department and the FBI effectively rewrote the relevant criminal statute in order to avoid applying it to Clinton.

In his public statements about Clinton, Obama has stressed that she is an exemplary public servant who would never intentionally harm the United States. It merely requires proof of gross negligence. This is entirely lawful and appropriate, since we’re talking about a law that can apply only to government officials who have a special duty to preserve secrecy and who have been schooled in the proper handling of classified information. Yet the Justice Department frivolously suggested that applying the law exactly the way it is written — something the Justice Department routinely tells judges they must do — would, in Clinton’s case, potentially raise constitutional problems. Alas, the Justice Department and the FBI have to take that indefensible position here.

Otherwise, Clinton would not be the only one in legal jeopardy. From these facts and circumstances, we must deduce that it is possible, if not highly likely, that President Obama himself has been grossly negligent in handling classified information. That is why the Clinton e-mail scandal never had a chance of leading to criminal charges. Please forward this error screen to 199. Hillary Clinton doesn’t just want you to read her campaign memoir.

It turns out she thinks you should read a few more books. From dystopian fiction to inspirational poetry. 813 0 0 1 . 696 0 0 0 1. 415 0 0 0 1. 748 0 0 0 2. 624 0 0 0 1.

Facebook Comments