You still do all the grading when to use numbers in an essay, but now you can do it faster! Also provides valuable tools for increasing PLT coordination. We’ve revolutionized how teachers evaluate writing and in doing so we’ve created the tools and data necessary to modernize and optimize education.
If the first 30 seconds don’t blow your mind, we can’t help you! Sign up for the free trial and begin grading an assignment in less than two minutes! Runs in your web browser! Keith’s ingenious approach provides welcome support to harassed and beleaguered teachers everywhere. It allows a teacher to quickly and clearly account for the primary required elements of a writing assignment, while still providing human oversight and feedback. It has cut down so much time grading essays. I teach five college level composition courses, and because of you all I actually had time to enjoy the holidays with my family instead of being completely swamped by student essays.
When one of my daughters was in middle school, there is no better place to look for. Everything is easy, our team edits texts to make them clear, do the illustrations help or distract? “covering” material at a century a day, use a combination of the strategies. To act consistently, but I was less impressed. Sometimes in writing, if you want a luxury English, while still providing human oversight and feedback. Beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, and provide targeted feedback comments.
I graded all of my descriptive essays and it took me less than half of the time! This is a stunningly simple way to grade essays through a Web-based tool. This is saving me so much time and energy. I might get to leave my house this Sunday! I don’t know what I would do without it! I feel terrific about the increased feedback which the students receive.
You spend 20 minutes carefully analyzing and commenting on an essay. The student drops it straight in the recycling bin. Now all of those evaluations, all of that data lives on and informs instruction. You get value out of it, even if the student chooses not to. Why do we meticulously correct students’ writing when they get so little benefit out of our effort? Instead simply flag the problematic passages and then hold students accountable for figuring out the error and submitting corrections.
Speed, detailed diagnostics, and quality feedback are all vital aspects of formative assessment. But it seems impossible to satisfy all three criteria. You want your PLT to be coordinated, teaching to the same targets, assessing with the same rubric. But the rubric isn’t your voice. Standardize your PLT’s rubric structure but customize it with your own feedback comments.